Choose the report structure
Start from the appropriate approved template, project type and document metadata.
Create branded reports with reusable technical content, project variables, investigation context, document review and controlled PDF or DOCX output.
Australian geotechnical workflow
Geotechnical reports bring together project context, investigation records, laboratory results, calculations, interpretation, figures and recommendations. Manual assembly creates repeated formatting work and increases the chance that a table, log or result is copied from the wrong revision. GeoCRM can use approved project data and reusable report structures to reduce document assembly. Automation should handle repeatable content while competent authors and reviewers remain responsible for interpretation, limitations, conclusions and final issue.
Build the report from structured sections and rich document content.
Use controlled templates, variables and standard content without copying old reports.
Bring client, project, job, investigation and technical context into the document.
Review the document and produce controlled PDF or DOCX outputs.
Start from the appropriate approved template, project type and document metadata.
Populate controlled project details, logs, results, tables or attachments from reviewed sources.
Add project-specific interpretation and route the draft through technical and editorial checking.
Record revision, approval and issue details with the project and supporting evidence.
Standardise branding, headings, disclaimers and repeatable project information.
Reduce manual copying from separate registers and spreadsheets.
Use reviewed source records in appendices and tables where configured.
Distinguish drafts, checked versions and issued deliverables.
Keep reviewer comments, response and approval status visible.
Retain the issued report with its originating project and supporting records.
It can assist with structured and repeatable content, but qualified professionals must author and approve technical interpretation and recommendations.
Existing templates can be assessed and mapped; complex formatting or macros may require adaptation.
No. Automation reduces assembly work but makes controlled source data and competent review even more important.
The workflow can preserve revision and issue status with the project record.
See it with your own workflow
Bring a real project, schedule, field record, laboratory request or report. We will show how the workflow can be configured without asking you to share confidential client data.