Start with the workflow creating the most pressure. We separate the ongoing subscription from implementation and document both before you make a decision.
Choose the right starting scope
Your proposal reflects the workflows, internal users, locations, migration and rollout support required by your operation.
For a smaller geotechnical office or laboratory replacing one high-pressure operational process.
Tailored proposal
Scoped to your team and starting workflow
A practical starting point for:
For growing firms connecting field, laboratory, engineering and office delivery.
Tailored proposal
Based on operational scope and rollout needs
Designed for:
For multi-team or multi-location firms that need stronger operational control.
Tailored proposal
Scoped after a workflow and implementation review
Built for:
A team starting with scheduling and digital dockets has a different subscription and implementation scope from a multi-location firm connecting field, laboratory and reporting workflows. A short review prevents you paying for complexity you do not need.
The main factors are your number of internal users, operating locations and the workflows included. The proposal states the ongoing subscription separately from implementation.
Depending on scope, implementation can include workflow mapping, configuration, data migration, training and rollout support. The deliverables and fee are agreed before work begins.
Yes. Many teams begin with scheduling, digital dockets, laboratory work requests or reporting, then connect adjacent modules as adoption grows.
No. Subscription sizing is based on the people inside your organisation who use GeoCRM to run operations. Any external access requirement is scoped separately.
No generic quote
We will recommend a starting scope and provide a proposal that separates subscription, implementation and any optional migration work.
