Define controlled requirements
Map roles, methods, templates, equipment checks, approvals and retention rules.
Keep method versions, technician authorisations, equipment evidence, acceptance checks and result review connected to the laboratory record.
Australian geotechnical workflow
Quality management in geotechnical work depends on controlled methods, competent people, suitable equipment, traceable records, review and action when something goes wrong. A software badge cannot establish compliance, accreditation or technical validity. GeoCRM can organise the operational evidence around those controls: current records, assigned responsibilities, review states, exceptions and linked source data. It should be configured to support the laboratory or consultancy's documented management system—not replace it.
Retain method codes, versions, requirements and active status.
Record who is authorised for laboratory methods and roles over defined periods.
Move test records through review and approval with clear responsibility.
Keep equipment, environmental and workflow evidence with the result.
Map roles, methods, templates, equipment checks, approvals and retention rules.
Keep sample, worksheet, field, equipment and review records connected to the activity.
Record nonconforming work, failed checks, deviations and the action required.
Use current status and history to support internal review, corrective action and improvement.
Reduce reliance on uncontrolled spreadsheet copies and personal folders.
Separate preparation, testing, checking, approval and issue roles as needed.
Make relevant calibration and authorisation information easier to verify.
Keep the problem, assessment, action, responsibility and closure evidence together.
Retain status, comments and approved outputs with the originating work.
Find connected records without reconstructing the workflow from several systems.
NATA accredits conformity-assessment bodies, not software products. GeoCRM can support evidence and controlled workflow within an organisation's quality system.
No. Compliance depends on the laboratory's people, methods, equipment, management system and effective implementation.
A configured workflow can record exceptions, actions, owners and closure evidence.
Access should follow your security and audit procedures. Relevant evidence can be provided without exposing unrelated client or business data.
See it with your own workflow
Bring a real project, schedule, field record, laboratory request or report. We will show how the workflow can be configured without asking you to share confidential client data.